A look with context
We understand astrology as a symbolic language to explore experiences, connections and personal questions. A position in the chart makes sense in relation to the whole: no sign, planet or aspect is enough on its own to define a person.
Our editorial line prioritizes nuances and freedom of interpretation. We avoid rigid labels, inevitable predictions and messages that generate fear or dependence. Each reading should leave room for your story, your circumstances, and your decisions.
Clarity and depth in each content
Articles and guides should answer a recognizable question, explain the concepts they use, and develop your own interpretation of the topic. Examples help translate ideas into everyday situations; They do not describe universal experiences or testimonies of real people.
The quality criterion is that each page provides understanding. We prioritize concrete explanations, relevant connections and accessible language, without oversimplifying or repeating formulas that could be applied to any chart.
Sources and foundations
We distinguish astronomical data, calculation conventions and astrological interpretations. The accuracy of a planetary position does not turn its symbolic interpretation into a scientific conclusion about personality or the future.
References must allow the origin of a data or idea to be identified. When there are differences between schools or systems, it is appropriate to clarify the approach used. Our calculation methodology details the technical bases, sources and criteria of the tools.
Review and update
The editorial review has as criteria the coherence of the interpretation, the correct use of the concepts, the clarity of the examples and the correspondence between what a page promises and what it actually explains. It also considers the consistency of the references and the operation of the links that accompany the reading.
The contents may be expanded or corrected to incorporate clarifications, improve an explanation or resolve errors. Update dates should reflect substantial changes, not modifications intended solely to give the appearance of newness.
Independence and transparency
The interpretation criteria are maintained both in the free content and in the Astral+ proposals. Access to a paid feature does not imply greater certainty about your life or a guarantee of results.
Customized tools relate your chart data to interpretive content. AI chat services are identified in their interface and are not presented as a live human query. You can learn more at our interpretation system.
Respect for people and their decisions
We look for a respectful language, free of stereotypes and judgments about identities, ways of connecting or life paths. A chart does not allow you to attribute intentions to another person or justify behavior that violates your limits.
The contents have an educational purpose and personal exploration. They do not offer diagnoses or substitute professional support in health, legal matters or financial decisions. The reading ranges explain these limits.
Corrections and editorial queries
If you find incorrect information, an imprecise reference, or an explanation that needs more context, you can write to us from Contact. I included the link to the page and the fragment you want to point out to facilitate your review. It is not necessary to share birth data or private information to request an editorial correction.
Last update: .